Monday, 7 March 2022

ThAct :Transcendentalism

 Hello friends, 

I am Bhavna Sosa , Student of MK Bhavnagar University. This Blog-post is a response to the thinking activity on 'Transcendentalism' given by our professor Vaidehi ma'am. 

What is Transcendentalism ?


Transcendentalism is a term associated with a group of new ideas in literature that emerged in New England in the early-to- mid 19th Century. The major figures in the movement included Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau.

Ralph Waldo Emerson :-

Ralph Waldo Emerson began his adult life as a Unitarian minister. He completed his studies at Harvard. As a child, he was greatly influenced by his aunt who introduced him to concepts such as the ideas of Hinduism. Emerson brought ideas of science, mysticism, and Eastern religions into the transcendentalist movement. 

Emerson's background as a minister greatly helped spread the ideas of transcendentalism. He preached in many churches, so many people were inclined to believe him. Emerson travelled a lot which encouraged the spread of trascendental ideas. 

One of Emerson's most prominent works was "The American Scholar." In this famous essay, he encouraged Americans to be proud of themselves and to stop looking elsewhere for ideas and inspiration.

David Henry Thoreau :-

Henry David Thoreau placed great emphasis on the importance of nature in one's life. For two years of his life, Thoreau lived in a hut he built on Walden Pond. He later wrote a book called Walden which described his experiences while living amongst nature. He also wrote an essay called "Civil Disobedience." The main purpose of this essay was that one's own conscience should be held at a higher priority than the law. 

These authors, along with others, were part of The Transcendental Club. The group met in Boston at the home of George Ripley. They started a publication known as The Dial which was edited by Margaret Fuller. Fuller was a radical feminist at the time.

Transcendentalists talks about Individual’s relation with Nature. What is Nature for you? Share your views.


According to me, nature is fundamental to our life. Nature also gives peace of mind. Nature performs major miracles for us every day – from giving us great views and helping to prevent floods to regulating the weather and keeping us supplied with clean water, fresh air and plentiful food.

Transcendentalism is an American Philosophy that influenced American Literature at length. Can you find any Indian/Regional literature or Philosophy came up with such similar thought?

I found many similar thoughts in Indian philosophy. Some of them I have discussed here. 

There are six major schools of Vedic philosophy-Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mimansa,and Vedanta, and five major heterodox schools-Jain, Buddhist, Ajivika, Ajnana, and Charvaka. However, there are other methods of classification; Vidyaranya for instance identifies sixteen schools of Indian philosophy by including those that belong to the Śaiva and Raseśvara traditions.

The main schools of Indian philosophy were formalised and recognised chiefly between 500 BCE and the late centuries of the Common Era.Competition and integration between the various schools was intense, despite later claims of Hindu unity. Some schools like Jainism, Buddhism, Yoga, Saiva and Vedanta survived, but others, like Ajnana, Charvaka and Ajivika did not.

Samkhya :-

Aphilosophical tradition which regards the universe as consisting of two independent realities: purusha and prakrti and which describes a soteriology based on this duality, in which purush is discerned and disentangled from the impurities of prakriti. It has included atheistic authors as well as some theistic thinkers, and forms the basis of much of subsequent Indian philosophy.

Yoga:-

 A school similar to Samkhya which accepts a personal god and focuses on yogic practice.

Nyaya :-

A philosophy which focuses on logic and epistemology. It accepts six kinds of pramanas (epistemic warrants): (1) perception, (2) inference, (3) comparison and analogy, (4) postulation, derivation from circumstances, (5) non-perception, negative/cognitive proof and (6) word, testimony of past or present reliable experts. Nyaya defends a form of direct realism and a theory of substances.

Vaisesika :-

Closely related to the Nyaya school, this tradition focused on the metaphysics of substance, and on defending a theory of atoms. Unlike Nyaya, they only accept two pramanas: perception and inference.

Purva-Mimamsa, a school which focuses on exegesis of the Vedas, philology and the interpretation of Vedic ritual.

Vedanta:-

Focuses on interpreting the philosophy of the Upanishads, particularly the soteriological and metaphysical ideas relating to Atman and Brahman.





Sunday, 6 March 2022

Thinking Activity: W.H. Auden's Poems

 Hello friends!

 I am going to discuss W.H. Auden's poem. This task was given by Dr. Dilip Barad sir.

About W.H. Auden :- 


Wystan Hugh Auden was born in York, England, on February 21, 1907. He moved to Birmingham during childhood and was educated at Christ Church, Oxford. As a young man he was influenced by the poetry of Thomas Hardy and Robert Frost, as well as William Blake, Emily Dickinson, Gerard Manley Hopkins, and Old English verse. At Oxford his precocity as a poet was immediately apparent, and he formed lifelong friendships with two fellow writers, Stephen Spender and Christopher Isherwood.

This blog discuss to Auden's three poems which are 'Sept, 1 1939, Epitaph on a Tyrant, and In Memory of W. B. Yeats. 

Auden's poems seem to be written in our times for 2022. Justify this in context of pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war.

Let's discuss  Epitaph on a Tyrant…

 Perfection, of a kind, was what he was after,

And the poetry he invented was easy to understand;

He knew human folly like the back of his hand,

And was greatly interested in armies and fleets;

When he laughed, respectable senators burst with laughter,

And when he cried the little children died in the streets.


W. H. Auden spent some time in Berlin during the 1930s, and it was here that he probably wrote ‘Epitaph on a Tyrant’, which was published in 1939, the year that the Second World War broke out. The specific tyrant Auden had in mind, then, was probably Adolf Hitler, though the poem can be analysed as a study in tyranny more generally, too.

We start with the word ‘Perfection’, which is immediately undermined by the qualifying clause ‘of a kind’. Something is either perfect or it is not; there is no such thing as perfection ‘of a kind’. This shows the unrealistic nature of the tyrant’s dream, which often stems from a desire to create some kind of utopia. The poetry the tyrant wrote, we are told, was easy to understand.

This suggests someone who believes art should be democratic and enjoyed by everybody, and such anti-elitism appears to be a positive trait at first. But the late Geoffrey Hill observed, in defence of difficult art, ‘that genuinely difficult art is truly democratic. And that tyranny requires simplification.’ Although we like to talk of difficult poetry as elitist and anti-democratic, perhaps it is the poetry which tries to fob us off with overly simplistic black-and-white depictions of the world which is the truly anti-democratic art.

And besides, what does it mean to talk of somebody having ‘invented’ poetry? Poetry is made, composed, written, created – but invented suggests that the tyrant wishes to take credit for having come up with the idea of poetry itself, or at least a whole new kind of poetry.

The ‘easy to understand’ poetry of the tyrant then feeds into the cliché in the next line, about him knowing folly ‘like the back of his hand’. This seems to be deliberate cliché, a ready-to-wear idiom that everyone can hear, understand, and interpret. But it also summons the more sinister idea of the back of one’s hand – used as a weapon for discipline or control of another – which reminds us that this is a tyrant’s hand, and that the same hand that pens all that accessible poetry also wields weapons to crush those who step out of line.

Again, this is a cliché – though here, a cliché with a twist. We usually speak of bursting into laughter, although bursting with laughter is not unheard of either. But given that this is a tyrant these senators serve, their (forced, false) laughter would be excessive as if they actually were in danger of exploding with the effort. And then comes the final chilling line: when the tyrant is angry or unhappy, children are killed in the streets because he lashes out and loses any remaining shreds of his humanity.

In this Auden's poems are related to pandemic and war. Then Epitaph on a Tyrant compares the Russia and Ukraine War to the start of the Russia - Ukraine war. Putin has been President of Russia in long time.

Now let's discuss  Sept,1,1939.

The poem, ‘1st September, 1939’ by W.H. Auden, was occasioned by Nazi Germany’s invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939. In this poem, the poet expresses his shock at the news. In the present stanza, he expresses his view that Germany alone is not to blame for starting the Great War. He says that correct research into the thinking of the German people from Martin Luther’s times to the present age can lead us to the conclusion that the Germans are great lovers of national freedom, self-respect, and national honor. The researches can also reveal the whole nature of the offense which lies embedded in the Versailles Treaty of 1918 and which has inflicted a great psychological wound on the German mind.


When we saw Hitler's invasion of Poland today, it was the same as Putin's invasion of Ukraine. World War ll is similar to today's situation of Ukraine- Russia.

Let's discuss In memory of W.B. Yeats.

In ‘In Memory of W.B. Yeats’ Auden taps into themes of life after death, the power of poetry, and the human condition. The powerful and wide-ranging themes are discussed within the context of Yeats’ life and death. Auden uses an exacting tone and direct language to depict the events around Yeat’s death. The mood is at times uplifting and at others concerning and worrying. There are many dark images and many fewer hopeful ones. 


We can say that after the Corona PandemicMany people died in the Corona pandemic but it had no effect on the world except for empathy. World was affected with economic breakdown and not many people died.

To wind up,  three poems are relates to today's situation. 

Thank you

Words :992





Friday, 4 March 2022

ThAct: I. A. Richards : Verbal Analysis of poem or song or film song lyric or hymn or devotional song

 Hello Friends!

In this blog I am going to discuss some verbal analysis of the poem /song /film song lyric/ hymns/ devotional songs or any poetic expression in any language keep in mind the kinds of misunderstanding discussed in the essay' Figurative Language'.

Ivor Armstrong Richards was a British poet and scholar. He was the pioneer in the domain of New Criticism. He was an English educator.

His works are:

   1. The Meaning of Meaning – 1923

    2. The Principles of Literary Criticism – 1924

    3. The Practical Criticism – 1929.

   He mainly talks about four kinds of misunderstanding:

    1.Misunderstanding of the sense of poetry: Careless, Intuitive reading

  2.Over-Literal reading: prosaic reading

 3.Defective scholarship; inappropriate metaphor

 4. Difference in meaning of words in poetry and prose (personification, Metaphors, etc.....)


Here I have done verbal analysis of the poem

        

         દફ્તરને ગુસ્સો આવ્યો


દફ્તરને ગુસ્સો આવ્યો, એ કોઠીમાં સંતાયું,

વીસ વરસ પહેલાંનું દફ્તર સપનામાં કેમ આવ્યું ?


સંતાકૂકડી, ખોખો, લંગડી પાડે છે પોકાર,

શેરી-ગલીઓ-મેદાનો પર કેવો અત્યાચાર ?

પગલાંઓને બદલે શાને રુંધે છે સુનકાર ?

ભાર વિનાનું ભણતર કે ભણતર વિનાનો ભાર ?

ટીવી ને કમ્પ્યૂટર નીચે પગપણું કચડાયું…

દફ્તરને ગુસ્સો આવ્યો, એ કોઠીમાં સંતાયું.


દફ્તરની અંદરથી સઘળાં સપનાંઓ છે ગુમ,

ટાઇમ-ટેબલ તો રહી ગયું પણ ટાઇમ થયો છે ગુમ;

દફ્તરમાં ઠાંસી છે ચોપડીઓની લૂમેલૂમ,

થોડી જગ્યા માંડ બચી ત્યાં ટ્યુશન પાડે બૂમ.

સ્કૂલ અને ટ્યુશનની વચ્ચે દફ્તર કેમ પિસાયું?

દફ્તરને ગુસ્સો આવ્યો, એ કોઠીમાં સંતાયું

                                  -વિવેક મનહર ટેલર


Misunderstanding :-

  When we read this poem during that time it increases the question in our mind that What this poem is talking about and also our mind thinks what message this poem gives us. Most of the time We never think connection of outside world. When I read the first line of this poem , I think that it is misunderstanding and also difficult to easily understand. We can see that poet say , 'dafterne gusso avyo, a kothima santayu' I never imagined about this scene because I think that How can possible anger of the mansion. What connection between anger and mansion.

When I read Word by word this poem does not get proper meaning in the poem. So this poem is very problematic to read word by word. Another thing is that poet used effective and figurative language such as, pokar, santakukadi, kho, time table, chopadi ni loomeloom, tution pade boom etc. Maybe, Poet used all this word connected with study and childhood. but I can't say this is a proper interpretation of poem. I have said that i automatically put in difficulty to understand the concept of poem.


Movie Screening - " Vita and Virginia" by Chanya Button

 Hello friends!

I am going to discuss the thinking activity on Movie Screening - "Vita and Virginia" by Chanya Button given by Vaidehi Hariyani Ma'am. 

About Film :-

This film was released in 2018 written and directed by Chanya Button. Starring Gemma Arterton as Vita Sackville-West Elizabeth Debicki as Virginia Woolf. Whole story line leads to the setting of the 1920s, the story of the love affair between socialite Vita Sackville-West and literary icon Virginia Woolf. This element of her life forced her to write and finally she shaped her last novel of her literary career by the very popular novel, 'Orlando:A Biography' published in 11 October 1928.


How far do you feel that Orlando is influenced by Vita and Virginia’s love affair? Does it talk only about that or do you find anything else too?

The relationship of Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West has gone down in literary history, and even today it holds a fascination, epitomising the allure of the unconventional, the bohemian, the slightly eccentric and exotic.

On December 15, 1922, Virginia Woolf recorded in her diary that she had met “the lovely aristocratic Sackville-West last night at Clive’s. Not much to my severe taste … all the supple ease of the aristocracy, but not the wit of the artist.” 

She was, of course, writing of Vita, the woman who would go on to become her lover, friend, and confidante.

Their affair has inspired biographies, a West End play, and most recently, a 2018 film. But none have come close to capturing the vibrant nuances and dynamics of their personalities, or the subtleties of a relationship that was more emotional than physical and that lasted until Virginia’s death in 1941.


Who do you think is confused about their identity Vita or Virginia? Explain with illustrations

Vita and Virginia identity. Both confuse her identity. By the time she met Virginia, Vita was thirty years old and an established author, having published several volumes of poetry and fiction with more commercial than literary success.

Virginia was ten years older, and had published three novels and survived three major bouts of insanity. The age difference and the apparent emotional fragility did not deter Vita, however, whose first impressions were far more favourable than Virginia’s. Soon after their first meeting, she wrote to her husband Harold Nicholson:

“I simply adore Virginia Woolf, and so would you … Mrs Woolf is so simple…At first you think she is plain, then a sort of spiritual beauty imposes itself on you, and you find a fascination in watching her…I’ve rarely taken such a fancy to anyone”.

In true Vita style - slightly arrogant, slightly pushy, but with a charm and vitality that few could resist - she persuaded Virginia into several dinners.


What is society’s thought about women and identity? Do you agree with them? If Yes then why? If no then why?

In society's thought about women and identity, I agree. Orlando becomes a woman, she understands that society expects her to “be obedient, chaste, scented, and exquisitely appareled.” The only problem, Orlando maintains, is that women are none of those things naturally, and Woolf uses Orlando’s transition to show how these expectations are artificial and socially constructed. Hairdressing alone takes up an hour of Orlando’s mornings as a woman, then “there’s looking in the looking-glass, another hour; there’s changing from silk to lace and from lace to paduasoy; and there’s being chaste year in year out.” The expectations and restrictions placed on women are ridiculous, Woolf implies, and are entirely manmade. “A pox on them!” Orlando says in response to society’s expectations of her as a woman, suddenly “realising for the first time, what, in other circumstances, she would have been taught as a child, that is to say, the sacred responsibilities of womanhood.” To Orlando-and, by extension, Woolf-“the sacred responsibilities of womanhood” amount to a nuisance, “a pox,” or, more precisely, a disease, which only serves to hinder women and hold them to impossible standards. In Orlando’s experience, being a woman “meant conventionality, meant slavery, meant deceit, meant denying her love, fettering her limbs, pursing her lips, and restraining her tongue”-all things she is not expected to do as a man. Orlando’s profound change places her, and Woolf, in a unique position to critique the existence of men and women respectively in English society, and her conclusion is that women are, in many ways, objectified and marginalised on account of their gender.


  What are your views on Gender Identity? Will you like to give any message to society?

Our society has a set of ideas about how we expect men and women to dress, behave, and present themselves.

Gender roles in society means how we’re expected to act, speak, dress, groom, and conduct ourselves based upon our assigned sex. For example, girls and women are generally expected to dress in typically feminine ways and be polite, accommodating, and nurturing. Men are generally expected to be strong, aggressive, and bold.

Every society, ethnic group, and culture has gender role expectations, but they can be very different from group to group. They can also change in the same society over time.


Write a note on the direction of the movie. Which symbols and space caught your attention while watching the movie?

“Vita & Virginia” wastes the talents of four people-its two subjects and the two women that play them. It is a deeply frustrating movie, a film that not only can’t find the right tone from scene to scene but feels disjointed in individual moments too. It is a bit of a chamber piece, a bit of a romance, a bit of a commentary on creativity, a bit of social commentary, even a bit of magical realism. At a certain point, I started to wonder if the disjointed nature of “Vita & Virginia” was designed purposefully to replicate the structure and themes of Woolf’s Orlando, but decided I was giving a messy movie too much credit. Sometimes a mess is just a mess.

The Woolf captured here is just starting to become the one we know today. She’s dealing with mental illness and anxiety over the publication of Mrs. Dalloway when she becomes infatuated with Vita, the yin to her yang. The idea that Vita should be a more vibrant, outgoing personality to counter Virginia’s reticent, wallflower personality is fine on a creative level, but it leads to a film with two performances at its centre that feel like they’re from different movies. Arterton goes broad in line reading and facial expressions, but Debicki goes too far in the other direction. If Arterton is playing in the back row of the theatre, Debicki is playing to the people who could afford the front. They’re both very good taken on their own, but it creates a lack of chemistry in the centre in which it doesn’t just feel like the two women have different personalities but like they’re in different movies. Arterton and Debicki are excellent actresses, but it was Button’s responsibility to pull them together as a director, and that just never happens.

Part of the problem is that the script never allows for depth of character, making the exaggerated over- and under-acting more apparent. This is a film filled with people who say what they want, feel, and need all the time. A character literally says, “You must remember that Virginia is vulnerable under all her brilliance.” Oh, really? Thanks. The film constantly telegraphs the intended depths of its storytelling without ever actually doing the digging. The result is an experience that’s oddly flat when it’s not spiralling off into flights of fancy, usually through a bouncy but slightly incongruous score or a bit of magical realism with Virginia, who has visions like birds attacking her or vines growing in her house.


Vita and Virginia" had to be made into Bollywood Adaptation, who do you think would be fit for the role of Vita and Virginia?

 If Vita and Virginia would be a Bollywood adaptation I would select Katrina Kaif in the role of Virginia Woolf and Anushka Sharma in the role of Vita Sackville.

Thank you

(Words :-1353)




Tuesday, 1 March 2022

Thinking Activity: Long Day's Journey into Night

 

Hello friends! 

 In this blog I am going to discuss Long Day's journey into night. This task  given by our Ma'am Yesha Bhatt.





1)"Old Sorrow, written in tears and blood":-


In only a little more than three years, Eugene O’Neill lost his father, mother and only brother. Two decades later he would restore that family to its troubled wholeness in arguably the greatest of all autobiographical dramas, Long Day’s Journey Into Night. James O’Neill, Eugene’s famous actor father, died of cancer in the summer of 1920 after living just long enough to witness his son’s breakthrough to Broadway success, Beyond the Horizon, which won the second Pulitzer Prize ever awarded in the drama category. The occasion of the father’s sudden illness and the son’s sudden acclaim coincided with a moment when they gained new sympathy, understanding and respect for each other in conversations that formed the basis for the dialogue in Act 4 of Long Day’s Journey.


After the lacerating experience of his father’s painful end Eugene plunged into a prolonged period of drinking, but soon after he sobered, he wrote a play that led to his being seen as the single most significant playwright in America. The Emperor Jones was hailed as the first play of the American art theater. An experiment in expressionism, the play takes us through the dark night of the soul of its title character, an African-American Pullman porter and escaped felon who connives his way to becoming emperor of a West Indian island. In the midst of a revolution and lost in a forest at night, Jones faces a series of apparitions taking him deeper and deeper into his past and ultimately into his race memory to discover the moment when he became alienated from his own soul and permanently lost his sense of belonging.


Like Long Day’s Journey, it is a memory play, which takes us into the process of guilty and sad remembrance. In that sense, it tells the story O’Neill had heard from his father, of a man who through greed and theatrical fakery became an emperor of sorts  as Edmond Dantès, the Count of Monte Cristo. James O’Neill played this part over four thousand times after buying rights to an adapted version of the Dumas novel in 1883, the same year his second son Edmund was born and two years prior to that boy dying of the measles. Probably the last time he ever played the part was in 1912, the year in which Long Day’s Journey is set, when he played Dantès in a 56-minute feature film. At the time of filming, his son Eugene was coming down with consumption (tuberculosis), and a day of diagnosis was unfolding into a night much like the one in the play.


Two years later, Eugene’s mother died of a brain tumor, and his brother Jamie died of alcoholism. O’Neill’s whole experience of birth family abruptly became memory, and it is no wonder that elements of his origin story adhered to many of the characterizations and plots in his plays, culminating in Long Day’s Journey. All four members of the family in this play descend into memory in search of the moment when they lost a sense of belonging, but no one more so than Mary Tyrone, who, like Brutus Jones, faces a series of ghosts or apparitions of the past and finally revisits the moment when her soul was severed from God.


In the decade following The Emperor Jones, O’Neill was wildly exploratory in his plays, and the American theatrical world sat back in amazement even when his experiments proved flops. With the sudden flux of income he, along with his wife Agnes Boulton, moved restlessly from house to house in search of what he called his “final harbor,” a sufficient home. In October 1925, during a stop in New London on business (selling those “bum” properties in which his father had invested), he drove out Pequot Avenue to look at the home of his youth. A “Monte Cristo” signboard still hung over the front door, but the house was vacant. In his diary he wrote: “Decay & ruin sad.” That night, he met Doc Ganey and a few of his other old pals at “the Club” in town and got thoroughly drunk. A few years later, his marriage to Boulton fell apart, and he sailed off to Europe with a woman who would become his third wife and surrogate mother  the beautiful Carlotta Monterey.


O’Neill’s search for home would continue for the rest of his life, but Carlotta was, with a few lapses, a constant. When they returned from France in 1931 for the production of his massive trilogy Mourning Becomes Electra, which was modeled on Aeschylus’ Oresteia, they bought a second-hand Cadillac and, driven by a chauffeur, motored up the New England coast, stopping in New London to revisit O’Neill’s “home.” Carlotta remarked what an inadequate house it was, calling it “a quaint little birdcage.” O’Neill could not bear to enter, but perhaps it was on that occasion he drew an accurate plan of the ground floor. New London and a house like this were clearly on his mind when two months later he awoke one morning with a play called Ah! Wilderness fully developed in his mind. It’s a comedy, a fantasy of what he called “the way I would have liked my boyhood to have been.”


He turned to the real story of his family in 1939–1940 when a worsening tremor in his hand made it clear that his writing career would soon come to an end. It was time to address the ghosts of his past. Over 147 days he wrote Long Day’s Journey, at a time when World War II was breaking out and he was visited by his own “misbegotten” sons. The elder, Eugene Jr., was losing himself to dissipation and squandered talent and the younger, Shane, was lost in a vague sense of art and soon to go to sea. Eugene O’Neill’s “play of old sorrow” was haunted in many ways by the past, but we know it was also troubled by the present, and of that torment came one of the masterpieces of American drama.


He knew that his family’s life would be affected by the play’s private disclosures, and so he asked that it not be published until twenty-five years after his death. Carlotta released the play for publication and production just three years after O’Neill’s death in 1953 because she understood the profundity of his intentions in writing the play. Critics and audiences, too, understood that the character Edmund, the “stammering” poet, was a stand-in for Eugene O’Neill himself who, because of what he had watched of his family drama, was capable of turning the painful and personal facts of this “night” into illuminative art. On O’Neill’s twelfth wedding anniversary in 1941, he gave Carlotta a typescript of the play with the following inscription, which she insisted must appear in all publications of the play. It is a moving testament to his achievement:


"Dearest: I give you the original script of this play of old sorrow, written in tears and blood. A sadly inappropriate gift, it would seem, for a day celebrating happiness. But you will understand. I mean it as a tribute to your love and tenderness which gave me the faith in love that enabled me to face my dead at last and write this play write it with deep pity and understanding and forgiveness for all the four haunted Tyrones."


2) Theme of addiction :-


Eugene O'Neill's Long Day's Journey into Night depicts the struggles of Mary Tyrone, a woman who abuses prescription painkillers and relapses into full-blown morphine addiction. It is also the story of how Mary's addiction rips her family apart, as her morphine use slowly becomes apparent to her husband and two sons. It is widely believed that Long Day's Journey into Night is an autobiographical play, and that the troubled characters in it are based on members of O'Neill's own family, including his mother, Ella, who struggled with morphine addiction for most of her life. In his dedication of the play to his wife Carlotta, O'Neill states that it is a "play of old sorrow, written in tears and blood," and that he wrote it "with deep pity and understanding and forgiveness for all the four haunted Tyrones."


Sense of failure :-


Long Day´s Journey into Night, one recognizes that each guilty character which appears in the play has to face the fact of having a moral responsibility rather than a criminal one. None of the family members can or will be imprisoned for the mistakes he or she has done, but each of them has to explain himself or herself in front of the accusations of the other members of the family. Having stated that moral guilt weighs heavily on each of the characters, the notion of guilt and blame will now be explained further.


James Tyrone, the head of the family and father of two sons, Jamie and Edmund, seems to be the man who is most to blame. Firstly, he seems to be responsible for the loneliness and morphine addiction of his wife, Mary Tyrone. Being a miser, Tyrone missed the chance to give her a real home with friends she could talk to and made his wife depressed and hopeless, so that her only escape was taking morphine: “I´ve never felt it was my home. Your father would never spend the money to make it right. But he´s never wanted family friends." Mary herself accuses his missing understanding for her, his drinking, and his unwillingness to give her a decent home. James Tyrone´s stinginess also brought him to the decision to call a cheap doctor when Mary was in pain after the birth of their younger son, Edmund. This doctor gave Mary morphine to stop the pain and started her addiction, which is another aspect of Tyrone´s guilt, as Edmund states: “I know damned well she´s not to blame! You are! Your damned stinginess! If you´d spent money for a decent doctor when she was so sick after I was born, she´d never have known morphine existed!”  Another result of his miserliness is the choice of a cheap doctor for Edmund, who finally gets the diagnosis that he has got consumption. Jamie, the older brother of Edmund, accuses his father of being responsible for Edmund´s illness because he did not send him to a decent doctor when Edmund got sick. On top of that, James Tyrone feels guilt over his elder son, Jamie, because Mary accuses him of “making Jamie into a boozer", “Since he first opened his eyes, he´s seen you drinking. And if he had a nightmare when he was little, or a stomach ache, your remedy was to give him a teaspoonful of whiskey to quiet him.” Being addicted to alcohol, Tyrone has always been a bad example for his elder son, who is now hanging around in bar rooms in order to get drunk.


Because of all these mistakes he has made, and his enduring stinginess, from which he cannot escape, Tyrone is accused by all the family members and is called a miser. Tyrone´s elder son blames him for almost everything; in his opinion, his father is to blame for Mary´s addiction, for Edmund´s ruined life, and even for his own failed career.


The second guilty character is Mary Tyrone, the wife of James and the mother of Jamie and Edmund. All over the play, one can recognize Mary´s permanent and strong sense of guilt and her desperation. One guilty action she seems to be most aware of is the fact that she is responsible for the death of her second child, Eugene. Even if she is not directly responsible for it, she accuses herself of not being at home when Jamie infected his brother Eugene with measles, from which the little child died. Mary´s thoughts always circle around this incident and she permanently states that she blames herself for Eugene´s death: “It was my fault. I should have insisted on staying with Eugene. Her only hope is that, some day, she does not “have to feel guilty any more”. But Mary also feels guilt over her living sons, Jamie and Edmund. When he says that he had “never dreamed before that any woman but whores took  Jamie explains his hopelessness which results from the discovery of his mother´s morphine addiction. The knowledge about his mother´s illness traumatized him and the knowledge that Mary is a drug addict is a burden on him, which disillusioned him and made him hopeless. Jamie´s failure in life and his escape into drinking alcohol is closely connected with the state of health of Mary – when Mary returns to taking morphine, Jamie starts drinking again. Another behavior one can blame Mary for is her rejection of Jamie, which results from the incident with Eugene. This rejection and her missing love has destroyed Jamie´s life and hurts his feelings. Furthermore, Hinden assumes that Mary riddled her son with guilt and always told him that he killed Eugene out of jealousy, which made Jamie feel blameworthy and desperate. Mary´s younger son, Edmund, suffers in almost the same manner from thinking that his mother is an addict. “God, it made everything in life seem rotten!”, Edmund tells the reader in Long Day´s Journey into Night. With this statement, he makes his mother responsible for his own failed life because Mary traumatized him, as well as she traumatized Jamie. Moreover, Mary feels guilt over having born Edmund because she had not wanted another child after the death of Eugene and is now of the opinion that she is responsible for the misfortune and sickness of Edmund.


To sum up, one can say that she feels, in general, inadequate for her role as wife and mother – a feeling which results from her morphine addiction, which takes her away from her family and into a dream world.


There are not just the parents who are affected by the notion of guilt and responsibility, but also the two brothers, Jamie and Edmund Tyrone.


Thank you!!


Word :- 2,359


Monday, 28 February 2022

Thinking Activity: Indian Poetics

Hello Friends!

 Pro. Vinod Joshi Sir, Gujarati poet and critic was invited to one week long talk session; starting from 10th February to 18th February, at the department of English M.K. Bhavnagar University.

Vinod Joshi sir  told us there is one difference between Indian Poetics and Western theory of criticism.

"Western Criticism deals with the influence of the work of art. While Indian Criticism deals with the process of work of art. In the world Criticism Indian Criticism is Unique."


Six part of school :-

Rasa - Bharat

Dhvani- Anandvardhan

Riti - Vamana

Alankara - Bhamaha


Vakrokti - Kuntaka


Auchitya - Kemendra


School of RASA :-

 

In the sixth chapter of Natyashashtra…


' विभावानुभावव्याभिचारी संयोगात रसनिष्पत्ति ।'


These four bhavaa vibhav, anubhav, vyabhicharibhav or sancharibhav and sanyog.


 vibhav -     Emotions arises because of vibhav

 Anubhav -  Reaction of Bhavaka

 Sancharibhav - Comes and go

 Sanyog -  Mirth, love, sorrow etc.


               " श्रृंगार-वीर-करुणाद्भुत-हास्‍य-भयानका: । 

                   बीभत्‍सरौद्रौ शान्‍तश्‍च रसा: नव प्रकीर्तिता: ।।"

Nine RASA in Natysastra with it is sthyibhav.

               RASA                   STHYIBHAV

               શૃંગાર                     રતિ

               વીર‌                        ઉત્સાહ

               કરૂણ                      શોક 

               અદ્ભુત                  વિસ્મય

               હાસ્ય                     હાસ

               ભયાનક                  ભય

               બીભત્સ                 જુગુપ્સા

               રૌદ્ર                        ક્રોધ

               શાંત                       શમ


There are four critics of Bharatmuni’s  Rasa theory.

  Bhatt Lollata

  Shree Shankuka

  Bhatt Nayaka

  Abhinav Gupta

School of Dhvani :-

Dhvani means 'The suggestive quality of poetic language. The theory Dhvanyaloka by Anandvardhan is known as the name of Dhvani.

                   "ध्वनि: काव्यस्य आत्मा।"     

                                                  -आनंदवर्धन

 

      -   ઓઢું તો ઓઢું તારી ચુંદડી.

       - રેડિયામા બેઠાં બેની બંગલો વગાડે.


Dhvani of three type can be found..

  • વસ્તુ ‌ધ્વનિ, રસ ‌ધ્વનિ, અલંકાર ‌ધ્વનિ


Alankar dhvani of example..

"મારી પાછળ મારી હસ્તીય વિખરાઈ ગઈ,

આંગળી જળ માંથી નીકળીને જગ્યા ભરાઈ ગઈ."

(1)Abhidha – Direct meaning

(2)Lakshna – We have direct meaning but we have to take another one.

(3)Vyanjana – There is the existence of direct meaning yet we have to use another meaning of wor

For example

  •  એક બિલાડી જાડી - અભિધા
  •  તેણે પહેરી સાડી - લક્ષણા 
  •  તળાવ માં તો મગર - વ્યંજના

વિજળીના ચમકારે મોતીડાં પરોવો પાનબાઈ - વ્યંજના

School of Riti :-

Acharya Vamana had given importance to Riti in his work “Ritivichar”. Riti is  the way of presentation.

                      शैली भवा शैली l


Four types of style :-


Vaidrbhi style

Gaudi style

Lati style

Panchali style

School of Alankara :-

         Bhamaha is the first who introduced alamkara poetics. Second and third chapter of KAVYALANKARA deals with 35 figures of speech.  Three type of Alankar…


શબ્દા અલંકાર, 

અર્થા અલંકાર,

 ઉભરા અલંકાર


Example

દમયંતિનુ મુખ ચંદ્ર જેવું છે.

T.S.Eliot's 'The waste Land'

Ernest Hemingway's' The old man and  sea'

 

School of Vakrokti :-


Kuntaka is known as the originator of this Sanskrit literary theory. Vakrokti is a theory of poetry which perceive ives poetry essentially in terms of the language of its expressions. Here Vakrokti turns into beauty.


Six parts of Vakrokti,


-વર્ણ વિન્યાસ વક્રતા

- પદપૂર્વાધ વક્રતા

- પદપરાર્ધ વક્રતા

- વાક્ય વક્રતા

- પ્રકરણ વક્રતા

- પ્રબંધ વક્રતા

School of Auchitya :-

Kshemendra’s discussions of the principle of Aucitya is from the point of view of both the writer and the reader and is articulated in its given cultural and philosophical context.


 









Saturday, 26 February 2022

Thinking Activity : W.B.Yeats

 

Hello Friends! In this blog I am going to discuss 'The Second Coming' by W.B. Yeats. This task was given by our pro.Dr. Dilipbarad sir. 

William Butler Yeats was an Irish poet, dramatist, writer and one of the foremost figures of 20th-century literature. He was a driving force behind the Irish Literary Revival and became a pillar of the Irish literary establishment who helped to found the Abbey Theatre, and in his later years served two terms as a Senator of the Irish Free State.



  Original Poem

       Turning and turning in the widening gyre

       The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

       Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

       Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

      The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

      The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

      The best lack all conviction, while the worst

      Are full of passionate intensityI.


      Surely some revelation is at hand;

      Surely the Second Coming is at hand.

      The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out

      When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi

     Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert

     A shape with lion body and the head of a man,

     A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,

     Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it

     Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.

     The darkness drops again; but now I know

     That twenty centuries of stony sleep

     Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,

     And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,

     Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

 The Second Coming” is an allegorical poem that W. B. Yeats penned in 1919 and published in The Dial in 1920. The poem describes a declining, violent present and an impending apocalyptic future, marked by the approach of a sphinxlike monster. The poem is often considered an allegory for the fraught times Yeats was living in—namely, the end of World War I, the midst of the Spanish flu pandemic, and the beginning of the Irish War of Independence. More broadly, some scholars believe the poem bemoans the devolution of Europe and European culture.

“The Second Coming” is also indicative of Yeats’s interest in the occult. Yeats and his wife, Georgie Hyde-Lees, believed in a universal spirit world which they contacted for artistic inspiration. Yeats references this spirit world in “The Second Coming”.

The poem opens to the image of a falcon flying in a spiral, or “gyre,” that keeps widening, but the falcon can’t hear its master, the falconer. The rest of the lines in the first stanza examine the decaying state of the world: anarchy prevails, blood flows like a tide, and blood drowns all semblance of innocence. The surviving good people lack all conviction, and the “worst” people are excited and ambitious.

In the second stanza the speaker asserts that a revelation and Second Coming are occurring. Just as the speaker makes his prediction, he sees a disturbing image from Spiritus Mundi, the spiritual, universal consciousness: a sphinxlike shape with a lion’s body and a man’s head somewhere in a desert. The sphinx has a vacant, merciless expression and moves slowly, rousing desert birds. The speaker can no longer see the image, but he realises that after 20 centuries of calm, a rocking cradle has turned the world into a nightmare. The speaker ends the last two lines with a question: What is this monster? As he asks, the monster “slouches” to Bethlehem to be born.His wife caught the virus and was very close to death. The highest death rates of the 1918–19 pandemic were among pregnant women—in some areas, it was an up to 70 percent death rate for these women.So here we found this poem as pandemic.It was a very terrible situation as we are facing today because of CORONA pandemic.

In the end we can say that the poem 'The second coming' is a Pandemic poem.

On Being Asked for a War Poem

‘On Being Asked for a War Poem’ is a poem by W. B. Yeats (1865-1939), written in 1915 and published the following year. It’s one of Yeats’s shortest well-known poems, comprising just six lines, and sets out why Yeats chooses not to write a ‘war poem’ for publication.

Before we analyse ‘On Being Asked for a War Poem’, here’s a reminder of the text of the poem.

I think it better that in times like these

A poet’s mouth be silent, for in truth

We have no gift to set a statesman right;

He has had enough of meddling who can please

A young girl in the indolence of her youth,

Or an old man upon a winter’s night.

There is something of a contradiction to this poem: in a war poetry collection, it is a poem that refuses to speak about war. The poem says that it is not the place of a poet to write about politics, but that the poet instead should limit his interference in the world to pleasing his companions.

Structure :-

 This poem is a sextet, with a rhyme scheme ABC, ABC. The first three lines refer to the poet’s attitude to writing about war; the next three lines write on the self-imposed limits of the poet’s interventions in the world.

Yeats maintains an ironic tone. He belittles the role of an Irish Poet to seduce a young woman and comfort and old man on his deathbed. He characterised poets as meddlers. Although he states a "poets mouth" should "be silent" he voices his opinion by writing the poem in the first place. He is against WW first.

 In terms of its form, the poem is written in iambic pentameter, rhymed abc abc. The final two lines are the only ones which might cause some real head-scratching from readers (and critics), but Yeats appears to be making an appeal to the broad readership that poetry enjoyed: young girls might enjoy his romantic verses about old Ireland, while an old man might enjoy the ballads.









How Literature Shaped Me?

  What is Literature? Literature is considered by many as the most effective means to comprehend the world. This is because it has been desc...